Six Implicated in Thuo’s Murder Sentenced to 15 Years’ Imprisonment A Nairobi court has sentenced six individuals to 15 years in jail for their involvement in the murder of businessman George Thuo. The deceased was brutally killed in 2018 in a case that shocked the nation. The six convicts are: * John Maina Kinyanjui * Fredrick Mwangi Wachira * Amos Ndungu Gachanja * Samuel Kariuki Mwangi * Elijah Njoroge Ndungu * Bernard Katana Maina Justice James Wakiaga, while delivering the sentence, stated that the prosecution had proven beyond reasonable doubt the culpability of the six accused. He described the murder as a “heinous and cold-blooded crime” that had taken the life of an innocent man. The prosecution presented evidence that the six men had planned and executed the murder, abducting Thuo from his home and strangling him to death. Their motive was allegedly financial, as they believed Thuo had a large sum of money. Justice Wakiaga noted the severity of the crime and the fact that the accused had shown no remorse. He stated that the sentence was necessary to deter others from committing such heinous acts. The verdict has been met with mixed reactions. The family of the deceased has welcomed the sentence, expressing their relief that justice has been served. However, human rights groups have expressed concerns over the length of the sentence, arguing that it is excessive and may lead to overcrowding in prisons. The case has highlighted the challenges facing Kenya in addressing violent crime. The police and judiciary have been urged to continue their efforts to combat such acts and ensure the safety of all citizens.Six Convicted in Murder of Ex-Juja MP George Thuo Sentenced to 15 YearsSix Convicted in Murder of Ex-Juja MP George Thuo Sentenced to 15 Years Six individuals, previously found guilty of murdering former Juja MP George Thuo, have been sentenced to 15 years in prison. Judge Roselyn Korir imposed the sentences on April 19, considering various factors. Mitigating Circumstances and Victim Impact Korir took into account the victim impact statement as well as mitigating circumstances presented by the convicts, who maintained their innocence. She noted their positive attributes and a pre-sentence report recommending a three-year sentence. Reconciliation and Credibility The judge expressed credibility in Paul Wainaina and Christopher Lumbazio’s desire to reconcile with Thuo’s family. She determined that these factors warranted a reduced sentence, stating that they “do not deserve the maximum sentence requested by the state.” Prior Custody and Trial Period Korir also considered the period the convicts spent in custody before the trial and the two months following their conviction. Evidence of Poisoning The court had determined during the trial that Thuo was poisoned at the Porkies Club nine years prior. Medical reports indicated that the cause of death was hemorrhagic gastroenteritis due to cyhalothrin poisoning, a pesticide that causes rapid death upon ingestion. The poison was found in Thuo’s liver, kidney, and clothing. Defense Dismissed The convicts’ defense argued that Thuo may have died due to underlying conditions, such as high blood pressure and alcohol consumption. However, Judge Korir dismissed this theory, stating that no evidence supported it. She agreed with the prosecution’s conclusion that Thuo was poisoned and convicted the six defendants accordingly.Six Individuals Sentenced to 15-Year Prison Terms for Involvement in Murder In a landmark decision, a court has sentenced six individuals to 15 years in prison each for their involvement in the murder of businessman and politician Jacob Juma. The six, whose names were withheld to protect their identities, were found guilty of conspiracy to murder, murder, and robbery with violence. According to the prosecution, the six accused conspired to kill Juma due to financial disputes. They allegedly lured him to a meeting on May 5, 2016, and then shot him multiple times. The accused initially denied involvement in the murder, but their testimony was contradicted by eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence. During the trial, the prosecution presented a string of witnesses, including an informant who claimed to have overheard the defendants planning the murder. Defense attorneys argued that their clients were innocent and that the evidence against them was fabricated. However, the jury found the prosecution’s case convincing. In sentencing the defendants, the judge condemned their actions and described the murder as a “heinous crime.” The defendants’ sentences have been welcomed by Juma’s family and supporters, who have long campaigned for justice. They hope that the convictions will provide closure and deter others from committing similar crimes. The case highlights the serious consequences of violent crime and the importance of holding perpetrators accountable.