In the pulsating series opener of the T20I rubber against Zimbabwe, Team India found themselves on the brink of a stunning victory, needing just 14 runs from the final three overs with seven wickets in hand. However, a perplexing decision by Washington Sundar left everyone baffled and searching for answers. With 13 runs to get off the penultimate over, Sundar, a promising all-rounder, opted to push a single and give the strike to Axar Patel. The move raised eyebrows, considering Sundar’s form and the match situation. Sundar, a left-handed batter, has been inconsistent with the bat lately and lacks the explosive firepower to finish matches. In contrast, Patel, a right-handed batter, is a more potent hitter and could have taken the game away from Zimbabwe with a boundary. The inexplicable decision proved costly, as Patel failed to connect cleanly on a full toss and was caught at short cover. The dismissal swung the momentum in Zimbabwe’s favor, and India went on to lose the match by 10 runs. Experts and fans alike were left perplexed by Sundar’s decision-making. Some suggested that it was a tactical move to protect Patel from facing a difficult bowler in the next over, but this reasoning seemed far-fetched, given the urgency of the situation. Others speculated that Sundar may have been influenced by the pressure of the chase, leading him to make a hasty and unwise choice. Whatever the reason, Sundar’s act will go down as one of the most baffling in recent memory, leaving everyone searching for answers. With the series tied 1-1, India will need to find some clarity in their batting strategy if they wish to triumph in Harare. Sundar’s inexplicable decision has raised questions about his decision-making abilities and may prompt the team management to re-evaluate their plans in the crucial matches to come.Washington Sundar’s tactical decisions in the final overs of India’s first T20I against Zimbabwe left many perplexed. Despite needing 14 runs off three balls, Sundar denied singles, took risky shots, and failed to rotate the strike effectively. His actions ultimately contributed to India’s 13-run loss.Washington Sundar’s tactical decisions in the final overs of India’s first T20I against Zimbabwe left many perplexed. Despite needing 14 runs off three balls, Sundar denied singles, took risky shots, and failed to rotate the strike effectively. His actions ultimately contributed to India’s 13-run loss.In the first T20I against Zimbabwe, India faced a perplexing situation when they required 14 runs from 3 balls with Washington Sundar at the crease. However, Sundar’s actions left many bewildered. With only three balls remaining, India needed a boundary to secure victory. Surprisingly, Sundar chose to play dot balls rather than taking any risks. This baffling decision sparked confusion and frustration among fans and commentators alike. India eventually fell short by one run, with Sikandar Raza securing the win for Zimbabwe. Sundar’s strange tactics raised questions about his strategy, with some speculating that he misjudged the situation or allowed the pressure to get to him. After the match, Sundar was criticized for his timid approach. Former Indian cricketer Ajay Jadeja expressed his dissatisfaction, saying, “You’ve got to try and hit a boundary. At least have a go.” Fans took to social media to voice their disappointment, with many questioning Sundar’s decision-making. The incident served as a reminder of the importance of calculated risk-taking in high-pressure situations. As India looks ahead to the remaining matches in the series, the baffling act of Washington Sundar remains a topic of discussion, leaving everyone searching for answers.