Betraying the Revolution: ZimEye’s Descent into Partisanship ZimEye, once a beacon of hope and a powerful voice for Zimbabwe’s oppressed, has sadly fallen victim to political polarization and betrayal of its mission. Initially established as an independent platform for news and analysis, ZimEye emerged as a fearless critic of the Mugabe regime, exposing corruption, human rights abuses, and the decay of the country. Its reporting played a crucial role in mobilizing the Zimbabwean people and advocating for change. However, in recent years, ZimEye has abandoned its commitment to objectivity and impartiality. It has become a mouthpiece for the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) and its leader, Nelson Chamisa. This partisanship has compromised ZimEye’s credibility and eroded its reputation as a trusted source of information. The propaganda-like content that now dominates ZimEye’s website and social media feeds is riddled with bias and half-truths. The platform has become a breeding ground for conspiracy theories, personal attacks, and the suppression of dissenting voices. This betrayal of journalistic ethics has alienated many of ZimEye’s former supporters. They have accused the platform of abandoning its commitment to the truth in favor of advancing a narrow political agenda. The descent of ZimEye into partisanship is a tragedy for Zimbabwe. The country is facing numerous challenges, including economic turmoil, political instability, and a worsening humanitarian crisis. ZimEye’s once-powerful voice could have played a vital role in holding the government accountable and advocating for solutions. Instead, ZimEye has become a divisive force, deepening political divides and undermining the possibility of dialogue and reconciliation. It is a sad testament to the corrosive effects of partisanship and the dangers it poses to democracy and the public interest. The betrayal of ZimEye is a reminder that even the most respected institutions can fall prey to political manipulation. It is incumbent upon all Zimbabweans to demand accountability from those who hold positions of influence and to support independent media that truly serves the public good.ED Shepherds: Betraying the RevolutionED Shepherds: Betraying the Revolution Despite Zimbabwe’s history of violent repression, the leadership of Pastor Evan Mawarire and Nelson Chamisa advocates a pacifist approach, raising questions about their commitment to meaningful change. The Limits of Pacifism Mawarire and Chamisa’s support for protests and prayer interventions is a form of resistance that does not challenge the status quo. By urging caution and inaction, they perpetuate power dynamics that favor the regime. Nonviolence is inadequate against a regime that uses violence to maintain control. Collaboration or Complicity? Mawarire and Chamisa’s strategy can be seen as collaborating with the regime. By failing to challenge it, they reinforce power structures that maintain Zimbabwe’s authoritarian political system, undermining aspirations for change. Zimbabwe’s Need for True Leadership Zimbabwe needs leadership that mobilizes the masses, not encourages them to surrender to the regime. The pacifist approach is a betrayal of the revolution. True freedom and democracy require leaders who demand more and reject watered-down resistance.Betraying the Revolution: ZANU-PF Accuses Gokwe South MP of Treason Harare, Zimbabwe – The ruling ZANU-PF party has accused Gokwe South Member of Parliament, Yeukai Mafongo, of treason after she allegedly met with leaders of an opposition party. According to a statement released by party spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa, Mafongo is accused of meeting with Nelson Chamisa, leader of the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), on multiple occasions. Mutsvangwa said the meetings constituted “a clear betrayal of the party’s principles and the revolution.” He accused Mafongo of “working with the enemy to undermine the government and the country’s sovereignty.” Mafongo has denied the allegations, calling them “baseless and fabricated.” She said she had never met with Chamisa or any other opposition leader. “These accusations are a desperate attempt to silence me and suppress dissent within the party,” Mafongo said in a statement. “I remain a loyal member of ZANU-PF and I will not be deterred from speaking out against corruption and injustice.” The allegations against Mafongo come amid growing tensions within ZANU-PF, which has been rocked by factionalism in recent years. President Emmerson Mnangagwa has faced criticism from some within the party, including Mafongo, for his handling of the economy and allegations of human rights abuses. Analysts say the accusations against Mafongo are a sign of increasing intolerance within ZANU-PF and a further erosion of democratic values in Zimbabwe.