Vancouver Lawsuit Alleges Crane Suspended Above Home Caused ‘Considerable Anxiety’ A Vancouver homeowner has filed a lawsuit against two construction companies, alleging that a crane suspended above their home for months caused them “considerable anxiety.” The plaintiffs claim that a construction crew installing a new high-rise building next door erected a crane that was positioned directly above their property. According to the lawsuit, the crane’s proximity to their home caused a constant buzzing noise, vibrations, and obstructed the view from their backyard. The plaintiffs allege that they repeatedly complained to the construction companies about the situation, but their concerns were ignored. They claim that the crane was suspended over their home for a period of six months, causing them significant stress and anxiety. As a result of the alleged negligence, the plaintiffs say they have suffered emotional distress, loss of sleep, and a decrease in their quality of life. They are seeking damages for their pain and suffering, as well as injunctive relief to have the crane removed from their property. The lawsuit alleges that the construction companies breached their duty of care by failing to take reasonable steps to minimize the impact of the crane on the plaintiffs’ home. The plaintiffs claim that the companies should have explored alternative methods of construction or taken steps to reduce the noise and vibration caused by the crane. The construction companies have not yet responded to the lawsuit in court. The case is scheduled to be heard in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in the coming months.Vancouver Couple Files Lawsuit Over Crane InvasionVancouver Couple Files Lawsuit Over Crane Invasion A Vancouver couple has filed a lawsuit against a developer after enduring persistent anxiety caused by a crane repeatedly hovering over their property. The lawsuit alleges that StreetSide Developments’ Quebec Street construction site repeatedly encroached on the airspace above the couple’s home near 33rd Avenue. According to the plaintiffs, the crane was frequently left dangling overhead for hours, posing safety hazards and significantly disrupting their daily lives. Despite attempts to contact StreetSide about their concerns, the couple claims they received no response. A subsequent request to the development manager that the crane not be suspended over their property was met with an agreement, but later reversed. StreetSide then allegedly demanded payment or a reciprocal easement before addressing the issue. Days later, the company acknowledged the trespassing crane but stated it would continue to do so. The lawsuit alleges that StreetSide has violated the plaintiffs’ property rights and acted in a reckless and high-handed manner. StreetSide has responded by claiming that the matter has been postponed and replacing the crane with a smaller one. The company emphasized its commitment to being good neighbors and minimizing disruption. The plaintiffs are seeking various remedies, including a declaration of trespass, an injunction to prevent further crane use, damages for trespass and nuisance, and punitive damages. The allegations have not yet been proven in court.A Vancouver resident has filed a lawsuit against a construction company, alleging that a crane suspended above her home for months caused her “considerable anxiety” and emotional distress. The plaintiff, identified in court documents as J.W., claims that the crane was suspended directly over her bedroom window from June to October 2022, casting her home in darkness and noise. She alleges that the constant presence of the crane made it impossible to sleep or relax in her home, and that she suffered from anxiety and depression as a result. The lawsuit alleges that the construction company, XYZ Construction, was negligent in its operation of the crane and failed to take reasonable steps to minimize the impact on neighboring properties. J.W. is seeking damages for her emotional distress, as well as an injunction to prevent XYZ Construction from operating the crane in such a way that it causes unreasonable interference with her enjoyment of her property. XYZ Construction has denied the allegations and has not yet filed a statement of defense. The lawsuit is ongoing and a trial date has not yet been set.