If I were to utter the words that Kwame Nkrumah was not the founder of Ghana, a tempest of thoughts would surge through my mind, each vying for prominence. Historical Truth: Foremost, the weight of historical evidence would bear down upon me. Nkrumah’s pivotal role in Ghana’s independence cannot be denied. He led the Gold Coast Colony through a decade-long struggle against British rule, culminating in Ghana’s emergence as an independent nation in 1957. National Identity and Pride: To many Ghanaians, Kwame Nkrumah embodies the spirit of their nationhood. His name is synonymous with Ghana’s freedom and sovereignty. Denying his status as founder would strike at the core of their national pride and identity. Cultural Significance: Nkrumah’s image and legacy have been deeply ingrained in Ghanaian culture. Streets, schools, and institutions bear his name. His speeches and ideas continue to inspire generations of Ghanaians. Diluting his role would diminish the cultural significance of his contributions. Respect for the Dead: As a symbol of national unity and sacrifice, Nkrumah is revered by many Ghanaians. Speaking ill of him could be seen as disrespectful to his memory and the legacy he left behind. Historical Revisionism: Accusing Nkrumah of not being the founder of Ghana would raise concerns about historical revisionism. It would suggest an attempt to rewrite history and undermine the sacrifices made by those who fought for Ghana’s independence. Political Ramifications: In a nation where political sensitivities run high, questioning Nkrumah’s status could have significant political implications. It might be used as a political tool to sow discord or advance partisan agendas. Ultimately, acknowledging Kwame Nkrumah as the founder of Ghana is not merely a matter of historical accuracy but also a recognition of the profound role he played in shaping the nation. To deny his contributions would be to disregard the collective memory and aspirations of the Ghanaian people.In a firm declaration, retired Ghanaian military officer Captain Joel Sowu asserted that the founding status of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah as the father of the nation is an irrefutable truth.In a firm declaration, retired Ghanaian military officer Captain Joel Sowu asserted that the founding status of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah as the father of the nation is an irrefutable truth. Captain Sowu vehemently condemned any attempts to deny Nkrumah’s pivotal role in Ghana’s independence and development. He emphasized that doing so would be a grave act of ignorance. While recognizing Nkrumah’s contributions, Captain Sowu also shed light on the reasons behind his 1966 overthrow, citing Nkrumah’s drive towards a one-party state. “Infringing upon individual freedoms ultimately affects everyone’s liberty, and it’s a principle I stand firmly against,” Captain Sowu stated. His own military service was marked by both triumph and adversity. In 1975, he faced arrest for an attempted coup against the then-head of state, Ignatius Kutu Acheampong. Ironically, in 1972, he played a part in the military overthrow of Kofi Abrefa Busia. Captain Sowu recounted his single-handed thwarting of a coup against the National Liberation Council, highlighting his unwavering commitment to safeguarding the nation’s stability. The article also features an embedded video of an interview with Captain Sowu, where he delves into his experiences and thoughts on Ghana’s political landscape.Something Would Cross My Mind if I Said Kwame Nkrumah is Not the Founder of Ghana Let us ask ourselves a simple question: Who is the founder of Ghana? The answer is obvious: Kwame Nkrumah. He is the one who led Ghana to independence from British colonial rule in 1957. He is the one who became Ghana’s first president and served in that role for nine years. He is the one who is considered to be the father of Ghanaian independence. So, what would cross your mind if someone said that Kwame Nkrumah is not the founder of Ghana? You might think that they are crazy. You might think that they are trying to rewrite history. You might think that they are trying to diminish the legacy of one of Africa’s greatest leaders. But what if there was evidence to support the claim that Kwame Nkrumah is not the founder of Ghana? What if there were documents that showed that someone else was actually responsible for leading Ghana to independence? What if there were eyewitness accounts that contradicted the official story? In that case, we would have to reconsider our understanding of Ghanaian history. We would have to be open to the possibility that the truth is not what we have always been told. Of course, this is not to say that Kwame Nkrumah is not a significant figure in Ghanaian history. He is still considered to be one of the most important leaders of the African independence movement. He is still revered by many Ghanaians as the father of their nation. But it is important to remember that history is not always black and white. There are often different perspectives on what happened in the past. And it is important to be open to the possibility that the truth may not be what we have always been told.