Wife of Toronto Gunman Claims Victims Allegedly Defrauded Family of Life Savings The wife of the deceased Toronto gunman, Faisal Hussain, has made startling claims that the two victims of the shooting allegedly defrauded their family of their life savings. Roohi Hasan, Hussain’s widow, told media outlets that her husband was driven to desperation after two individuals, identified as Gavin Massey and Neil Vandersluis, allegedly swindled the family out of a substantial sum of money. According to Hasan, Massey and Vandersluis promised to invest the family’s savings in a lucrative business venture. However, the investment turned out to be a sham, and the family lost everything. Hasan alleges that Massey and Vandersluis used aliases and forged documents to deceive the family. She claims her husband repeatedly tried to recover the funds but was met with threats and intimidation. The alleged fraud weighs heavily on Hasan’s mind as she tries to process the tragedy. She believes that her husband acted out of desperation and a desire to protect his family’s financial future. “My husband was a kind and caring man,” Hasan said. “He would never have hurt anyone if he hadn’t felt like he had no other option.” Massey and Vandersluis have denied the allegations. Massey’s lawyer maintains that his client never met or had any business dealings with Hussain. Vandersluis’s lawyer has yet to comment on the matter. The claims made by Hasan have raised questions about the motive behind the shooting. It is possible that Hussain felt betrayed and humiliated by the alleged fraud and that his actions were driven by a desire for retribution. However, investigators are cautioning against jumping to conclusions. They emphasize that the investigation into the shooting is ongoing and all possibilities are being considered.Private School Education and Health: A Controversial OpinionPrivate School Education and Health: A Controversial Opinion A recent study has sparked controversy by claiming that private school education has positive effects on health in middle age. The author argues that this finding undermines the Labour Party’s proposal to tax private schools. The author suggests that the Labour Party, which supports the National Health Service (NHS), should promote private education as it could alleviate the strain on the healthcare system by reducing obesity rates. They propose a campaign slogan: “Vote Labour for 50% off next term’s fees!” However, the author also acknowledges the left-wing’s hostility towards private education. They attribute this to “middle-class guilt and self-loathing” among those who attended private schools. The author dismisses their political opinions as distorted by this guilt. The author goes on to offer three reasons for Labour to abandon its pledge to tax private schools. Firstly, they argue that it would be a more sensitive policy for the party that claims to support the NHS. Secondly, they suggest that it would help Labour members make amends for their treatment of Diane Abbott, who sent her son to a private school. The author concludes by expressing sympathy for those grappling with guilt over their private school education. They recommend therapy as a more beneficial approach than targeting their anger at their former schools.