Woman Sues Singapore General Hospital Alleging Uterus Removal Surgery Compromised Kidney Function A woman in Singapore has filed a lawsuit against Singapore General Hospital (SGH), claiming that a hysterectomy she underwent there resulted in severe kidney damage. The plaintiff, 46-year-old Ms. Wong, underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy at SGH in 2019. According to the lawsuit, the surgery was performed to remove Ms. Wong’s uterus due to fibroids. However, Ms. Wong alleges that during the surgery, the ureter connecting her left kidney to her bladder was accidentally cut. This caused urine to leak into her abdominal cavity, leading to a buildup of pressure on her kidney and eventually impairing its function. As a result of the alleged negligence, Ms. Wong claims she has suffered severe pain, reduced kidney function, and ongoing medical expenses. She is seeking damages for her injuries, pain and suffering, and loss of income. In response to the lawsuit, SGH has stated that it “takes patient safety very seriously” and is currently investigating the matter. The hospital has not yet filed a formal defense. The case has raised concerns about the potential risks associated with hysterectomies and the importance of informed consent. Hysterectomies are relatively common surgical procedures, typically performed to remove the uterus due to conditions such as fibroids, endometriosis, or cancer. While the majority of hysterectomies are safe, there is a small risk of complications, including damage to surrounding organs. It is crucial for patients to be fully informed of the potential risks and benefits of any surgical procedure before providing consent. This includes understanding the potential impact on other organs and functions. The ongoing lawsuit highlights the importance of holding healthcare providers accountable for any negligence that may harm patients. It also serves as a reminder that patients have the right to seek compensation for injuries sustained during medical treatment.Negligence Alleged in Surgery at Singapore General HospitalNegligence Alleged in Surgery at Singapore General Hospital A woman has filed a lawsuit against Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and a surgeon who performed a surgery on her, alleging negligence. Faith Gao claims that the surgery blocked a tube connecting her kidneys to her bladder and left one of her kidneys functioning at only 6%. Details of the Case * Allegation: Ms. Gao alleges that the surgery performed by Professor Tan Hak Koon caused an obstruction in her ureter, leading to kidney damage. * Surgeon’s Defense: Professor Tan and SGH deny negligence, maintaining that the surgery was performed properly and the obstruction was not their fault. * Expert Witnesses: Ms. Gao’s case relies on the testimony of two doctors, Dr. Lewis Liew and Dr. Gong Ing San, who believe her claim has merit. * Hospital’s Response: SGH claims that Ms. Gao’s injury was caused by delayed treatment for the obstruction, which Dr. Liew failed to properly investigate. * Counterclaim: SGH has filed a counterclaim for outstanding hospital bills against Ms. Gao. Legal Arguments Ms. Gao contends that the defendants breached their duty of care by performing the surgery negligently and failing to exercise reasonable care. The hospital and surgeon argue that they were not negligent and that the injury was caused by external factors. Trial Proceedings The trial began at the High Court on June 25, 2021, with Judge Choo Han Teck presiding. The parties presented their opening statements and will call expert witnesses to support their claims. The outcome of the trial will determine whether Ms. Gao is entitled to compensation for her alleged injuries and whether SGH’s counterclaim for hospital bills is successful.A woman has filed a lawsuit against Singapore General Hospital, alleging that a uterus removal surgery she underwent at the hospital in 2018 caused damage to her kidney. The plaintiff, identified only as Mdm L, claims that the surgery, which was performed laparoscopically, resulted in a ureteric fistula, which is a hole between the ureter and the vagina. This fistula caused urine to leak into her vagina, leading to recurrent urinary tract infections and sepsis. Mdm L alleges that the hospital was negligent in performing the surgery and that the surgeon who performed the procedure failed to take proper care to avoid damaging her ureter. She also alleges that the hospital failed to properly diagnose and treat the ureteric fistula, which resulted in her suffering further damage to her kidney. As a result of the alleged negligence, Mdm L claims that she has suffered significant pain and suffering, as well as financial losses due to the need for ongoing medical treatment. She is seeking damages from the hospital for her injuries, pain and suffering, and financial losses. The hospital has denied the allegations in the lawsuit and has stated that it will vigorously defend itself against the claims. The case is still ongoing.