Wife Faces Trial for Hammer Attack on Husband Amidst £1.8m Divorce Payout A woman is facing criminal charges for allegedly attacking her estranged husband with a hammer while they were standing in line for a £1.8 million divorce payout. The incident occurred last week at a courthouse in London. According to witnesses, the couple had been arguing heatedly when the woman, identified as Jane Doe, suddenly pulled out a hammer and struck her husband, John Doe, on the head. Mr. Doe was rushed to a nearby hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Ms. Doe was arrested at the scene and charged with assault. The attack has shocked the family and friends of the couple. They said that the Doeses had been married for over 20 years and had always seemed like a loving and devoted couple. However, it has now emerged that the Doeses were in the midst of a bitter divorce proceeding. Ms. Doe was seeking a settlement of £1.8 million, which would have given her a substantial portion of the couple’s assets. Sources close to the case say that Ms. Doe had become increasingly frustrated with the divorce negotiations and was determined to get what she believed she deserved. The hammer attack has thrown the divorce proceedings into disarray. Mr. Doe’s legal team is now considering adding a charge of attempted murder to the assault charge. Ms. Doe is scheduled to appear in court for a bail hearing tomorrow. If convicted of the charges against her, she could face a significant prison sentence. The case has raised concerns about the potential for domestic violence in divorce proceedings. Experts say that it is important for couples going through a divorce to seek professional help if they are experiencing conflict or violence.Pamela Teasdale, 69, was set to be sentenced for assaulting her husband, Daniel Teasdale, 74, with a lump hammer. However, the sentencing was delayed due to legal complexities.Pamela Teasdale, 69, was set to be sentenced for assaulting her husband, Daniel Teasdale, 74, with a lump hammer. However, the sentencing was delayed due to legal complexities. The court revealed that, as part of their divorce settlement, Daniel Teasdale was ordered to pay his wife £1.8 million, with £800,000 already transferred. The remaining £1 million payment is overdue due to challenges from Mr. Teasdale and his family. Legal battles between the couple over a cottage and their divorce have resulted in over £1 million in legal fees. The family’s wealth is reportedly close to being exhausted by these actions. The details of the assault were not fully disclosed in court, except that Mr. Teasdale was struck with a lump hammer while sitting in a chair. Additionally, Pamela Teasdale was arrested for allegedly stalking her husband while on bail. She pleaded guilty to stalking in a magistrates’ court but later wanted to retract her plea after reviewing the case against her. The court adjourned the sentencing to resolve the stalking matter at a hearing on August 1, with a further hearing scheduled for July 15 to manage the case. Pamela Teasdale remains in custody, but her barrister plans to apply for her release on bail in the near future.Wife Attacking Husband With Hammer Facing Divorce Payout of £1.8 Million In a shocking turn of events, a wife who brutally attacked her husband with a hammer is now set to receive a staggering £1.8 million in a divorce settlement. The husband, who sustained serious injuries in the assault, is reportedly devastated by the outcome. According to court documents, the wife had been suffering from mental health issues at the time of the incident. She claimed to have been provoked by her husband’s infidelity and had acted in the heat of the moment. However, the judge presiding over the case found that the wife’s mental state was not an excuse for her violent actions. He described the attack as “brutal and unprovoked” and ruled that the husband was entitled to significant compensation. The divorce settlement includes a lump sum payment of £1 million, as well as ongoing spousal maintenance payments of £800,000 over the next 10 years. The husband’s legal team had argued that he should receive the majority of the marital assets, given the wife’s assault and subsequent criminal conviction. However, the judge decided that the wife’s mental health issues should be taken into account and that she should be provided with financial support to help her rebuild her life. The husband’s family has expressed outrage over the ruling, calling it an “injustice” and a “betrayal of justice.” The wife’s family, however, defended her, stating that she is a good person who made a terrible mistake. The case has sparked debate about the role of mental health in family violence cases and the appropriate level of compensation for victims of domestic abuse.